Search found 5 matches

Wed Dec 21, 2022 5:34 am
Replies: 35
Views: 70642

Re: V5 in Development

Of course, Wizard-3 and -4 were edited into CM 3rd Ed, post OD&D. As were spell complexities... Whoa, I had no idea. Like I said I never had a copy of Chainmail and my copies of D&D are from the 1974 printing, looks like my Chainmail pdf is a revision. Huh, time to hunt down an original! So...
Mon Dec 19, 2022 5:39 pm
Replies: 35
Views: 70642

Re: V5 in Development

Awesome waysoftheearth , that makes a lot a sense, the original authors put a lot of themselves into the works. I noticed your Fantasy Combat Table wasn't filled out yet, so I started diving into the original Chainmail rules which I never had as kid, then found the absolutely invaluable The Compleat...
Mon Dec 19, 2022 4:01 am
Replies: 35
Views: 70642

Re: V5 in Development

I noticed the Player Characters per level Hit Dice and Fighting Capacity numbers are quite a bit different in V5 than they are in original D&D. Are V5's a rebalance or are they from a later OD&D supplement?
Sat Dec 17, 2022 11:38 pm
Replies: 4
Views: 1252

Re: V4 fighter errata

Yes! Thank you waysoftheearth . Sorry, I had somehow missed V5 in my hunt for 0e rules - I've read so many other manuals in this last week, all of them missing key details but once I found your(?) absolutely unbelievably impressive Annotated V5 I had all my questions answered. Now I have all new que...
Thu Dec 15, 2022 2:15 am
Replies: 4
Views: 1252

V4 fighter errata

Is there a V4 errata I should incorporate? Should I just use V5? In the Fighter section it says: In melee combat versus normal-types a fighter throws one attack roll as a 1st level fighter for each of his own hit die In the Combat section it says: When a single attack roll is used the attacker strik...

Go to advanced search

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
Designed by ST Software.